<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>A-11 Offense ... The future of football? </title>
        <link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/5090/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ http://highschool.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=825031



Josh Katzowitz

Special to Rivals HighWhen quarterback Jeremy George entered the
Piedmont (Calif.) High School football coaches&#39; office to talk to Kurt Bryan, he noticed an unusual formation on the dry-erase board.

At first, George thought the formation was meant for the punt team.

No, Bryan said, that&#39;s our new offense.

George looked back to the board and was a little confused.

&quot;Initially, the first thought I had was,... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Kickapps</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:44:25 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:46:03 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.kickapps.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://kickapps.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/24136/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-24136</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Small teams will have a lot of problems with the O-line, and this is a way to help that. They don&#39;t have to pound it between the tackles, or have the QB
drop back while 6 guys plow through the line and pressure the QB to throw into tight coverage or take a sack. I think it&#39;s really genius. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (cumcball11)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/24136</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:46:02 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/23991/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-23991</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title">Hiesman84</strong> wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  color me unimpressed....you can put any number on anyone you want, you still have to have guys capable of power blocking, blocking in space, running in
  space, running in traffic, catching, etc etc. If you ask your whole squad to be a jack of all trades, then you&#39;ll get 11 guys who are a master of none.
  <br>
  <br>
  I&#39;m sure it makes a huge difference in &quot;bad team vs bad team&quot; games, but I have to think that good teams with good staffs can identify who is
  desigened for what role, and defense it. You can put any # on a kid with an OT&#39;s body that you want. At the end of the day, if he&#39;s an OT wearing #3,
  he&#39;s still got OT skills...and if he spends 1/2 his practice time knowing how to also do RB &amp; WR stuff, then he&#39;s going to be 1/2 the OT skill he
  could be.
  <br>
  <br>
  I just think sound, well coached teams, and beat... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (GHSfootball1990)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/23991</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:07:15 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/23976/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-23976</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Its going to cause confusion at first, but then teams will get used to it and defend it easily. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Muskyfan)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/23976</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:19:47 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/23975/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-23975</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ color me unimpressed....you can put any number on anyone you want,  you still have to have guys capable of power blocking, blocking in space, running in space,
running in traffic, catching, etc etc.  If you ask your whole squad to be a jack of all trades, then you&#39;ll get 11 guys who are a master of none.
<br>
<br>
I&#39;m sure it makes a huge difference in &quot;bad team vs bad team&quot; games, but I have to think that good teams with good staffs can identify who is
desigened for what role, and defense it.  You can put any # on a kid with an OT&#39;s body that you want.  At the end of the day, if he&#39;s an OT wearing #3,
he&#39;s still got OT skills...and if he spends 1/2 his practice time knowing how to also do RB &amp; WR stuff, then he&#39;s going to be 1/2 the OT skill he
could be.
<br>
<br>
I just think sound, well coached teams, and beat people on excecution (most playoff teams) should be able to out excecute this.  Maybe I&#39;m oversimplifying
things... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Hiesman84)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/23975</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:48:21 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/23972/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-23972</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title"><strong class="quote-title">Muskyfan</strong> wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Does anyone know if any coaches in Michigan are considering this offense? I&#39;d bet Dave Duram is already working on this at Hudsonville!
</blockquote>I would not be surprised if there were a few coaches adding some of this to their playbook. 
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (GHSfootball1990)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/23972</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:09:55 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/23967/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-23967</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Does anyone know if any coaches in Michigan are considering this offense? I&#39;d bet Dave Duram is already working on this at Hudsonville! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Muskyfan)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/23967</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:21:24 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/22219/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-22219</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Thats an interesting piece from pg2!
<br>
<br>
I would think about putting a package in if I was coaching a highschool team. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (someJets)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/22219</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:35:36 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/22216/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-22216</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Here is a story from ESPN.com today in their page 2 section....
<br>
<br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=weinreb/080811">http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=weinreb/080811</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (pats99)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/22216</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:26:26 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/22156/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-22156</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Mr NCAA wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <p>You got it. If they rush six then someone is uncovered and it is the QB&#39;s job to find him.</p>
  </blockquote>By my count there will still be 5 OL. Plus then you have the QB. So everyone else is covered under his scenario.
</blockquote>

<p> Sure there are 5 OL.... but if you rush 6 guys against the 3 guys on the LOS in the middle of the field, then you are only leaving 3 on each side of the
field max.....</p>

<p>One &quot;Lineman&quot; on each side can not catch a pass, but he can stand in the way of a defender so that in the case of a blitz, there is always a
safety valve &quot;screen&quot;available.</p>If you rush 6 guys at the QBs, they have to pretty much sprint 7-10 yards before the QB with the ball releases his
pass.  I bet the QB almost never gets sacked.
<br>
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (someJets)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/22156</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 20:20:27 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/21892/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-21892</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ha! Those were the days. Always use your blitz on first down....no need to save it, as then it might never be used. I also recall getting to 4th down and
needing two completions for a 1st. Punt? Never! We&#39;re going for the end zone! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (WolverineKeith)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/21892</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:24:00 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/21847/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-21847</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Don&#39;t forget that two completed passes = a first down.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (BiasedGuy)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/21847</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 05:49:25 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/21844/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-21844</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think I read somewhere that the DL and LBers actually have to count to &quot;5-Apple&quot; before rushing the Quarterback. ... and possibly one
&quot;blitz&#39; per series. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Searn)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/21844</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:47:51 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/21842/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-21842</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">BIGREDS89 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">completehomer wrote:</strong>
    <hr>
    I&#39;m confused about one thing: this offense claims that &quot;all 11 players&quot; can be eligible receivers. Clearly, no more than 5 players are really
    eligible in any given play. I assume they are insinuating that those 5 players are not determined until after the formation shifts. If this is the case, do
    you have no players wearing numbers between 50 and 79 on your offense?
    <br>
  </blockquote>

  <p><br>
  sorry I was explaining it while you were posting it must have been. Anyways if you have at least one of your &quot;qb&#39;s&quot; at least 7 yards back from
  the center in a position to recieve a long snap you are in a scrimmage kick or punt formation and the numbering system does not matter. You can have any
  combination of numbers on the field in that scenario. All 11 players are not eligible... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (WolverineKeith)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/21842</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:27:14 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/21831/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-21831</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <p>You got it. If they rush six then someone is uncovered and it is the QB&#39;s job to find him.</p>
</blockquote>By my count there will still be 5 OL.  Plus then you have the QB.  So everyone else is covered under his scenario. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/21831</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:00:48 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/21829/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-21829</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Wow. You better have a quick reacting QB. Oh and he better be able to move. Oh and he better be accurate. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (SenatorAtoms)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/21829</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:28:05 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/21824/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-21824</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">SenatorAtoms wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Shifting is legal. You just have to set for a period of time. Shift, then set.
  <br>
  <br>
  My question is what does the offense do when faced with 6 defenders going after the ball? Do they just rely on hot reads?
</blockquote>

<p> You got it.   If they rush six then someone is uncovered and it is the QB&#39;s job to find him.</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (GHSfootball1990)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/21824</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:42:59 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/21816/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-21816</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Shifting is legal. You just have to set for a period of time. Shift, then set.
<br>
<br>
My question is what does the offense do when faced with 6 defenders going after the ball? Do they just rely on hot reads? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (SenatorAtoms)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/21816</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:49 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/21810/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-21810</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ interesting offense.. gives me an idea.... hmm...............
<br>
anyhow does anyone know when &quot;shifting&quot; became legal in football? i understand motion but whose ideas was it to allow shifting? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (tommiegun80)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/21810</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:16:11 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/21808/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-21808</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Muskyfan wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  It seems like you would only be allowed to have so many players on the filed with eligible reciever jersey numbers. Or maybe the beauty of the formation is
  that a guy could line up in a &quot;guard&quot; position and then suddenly shift out to the flank as a wideout.
  <br>
</blockquote>

<p> Correct that is the beauty of the formation or at least that is what they say.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> This offense takes advantage of a
loophole in the scrimmage kick formation rule.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span> National Federation rules do not stipulate that a scrimmage kick
formation needs to be used on an obvious kicking down like the NCAA rules do.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"></p>

<p> </p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">In a scrimmage kick formation you are allowed to have 11 eligible numbers on the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (GHSfootball1990)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/21808</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:56:37 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/21762/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html#reply-21762</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It seems like you would only be allowed to have so many players on the filed with eligible reciever jersey numbers. Or maybe the beauty of the formation is
that a guy could line up in a &quot;guard&quot; position and then suddenly shift out to the flank as a wideout.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Muskyfan)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/21762</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:57:14 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ A-11 Offense ... The future of football?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/5090/t/A-11-Offense-The-future-of-football-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <a title="http://highschool.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=825031" target="_blank" href="http://highschool.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=825031">http://highschool.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=825031</a>
<br>
<br>

<p class="byline"><strong>Josh Katzowitz</strong>
<br>
Special to Rivals High</p>When quarterback <strong>Jeremy George</strong> entered the
Piedmont (Calif.) High School football coaches&#39; office to talk to <strong>Kurt Bryan</strong>, he noticed an unusual formation on the dry-erase board.

<p>At first, George thought the formation was meant for the punt team.</p>

<p>No, Bryan said, that&#39;s our new offense.</p>

<p>George looked back to the board and was a little confused.</p>

<p>&quot;Initially, the first thought I had was, &#39;I&#39;m pretty sure that&#39;s illegal,&#39; &quot; George said. &quot;I&#39;ve got to admit I thought it
was a little crazy. I think most of the players thought it was crazy. A lot of people were a little skeptical.&quot;</p>

<p>And for good... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Searn)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/5090</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:44:25 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>