<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Who is the favorite in the Southwestern Mich Athletic Conf WEST - 2009 </title>
        <link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/6816/t/---favorite---Southwestern-Mich-Athletic-Conf-WEST-2009.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ ? ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Kickapps</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:14:53 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:14:53 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.kickapps.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://kickapps.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who is the favorite in the Southwestern Mich Athletic Conf WEST - 2009  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/33174/t/---favorite---Southwestern-Mich-Athletic-Conf-WEST-2009.html#reply-33174</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">trezdustrial wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Portage Northern returns a ton of players! Just sayin.....
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
I am guessing Portage Northern is on everyones radar now with there win over JLC Friday. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (GHSfootball1990)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/33174</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:14:53 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who is the favorite in the Southwestern Mich Athletic Conf WEST - 2009  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/32787/t/---favorite---Southwestern-Mich-Athletic-Conf-WEST-2009.html#reply-32787</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Portage Northern returns a ton of players! Just sayin..... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (trezdustrial)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/32787</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:29:06 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who is the favorite in the Southwestern Mich Athletic Conf WEST - 2009  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/32323/t/---favorite---Southwestern-Mich-Athletic-Conf-WEST-2009.html#reply-32323</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m agreeing with everybody here that it&#39;s between St. Joe and S-L. I&#39;m going with S-L, based on the strength of players making their way up from
JV. The Portage teams (Central over Northern) are going to give those two a run for their money... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Nater MC)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/32323</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:49:47 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who is the favorite in the Southwestern Mich Athletic Conf WEST - 2009  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/31854/t/---favorite---Southwestern-Mich-Athletic-Conf-WEST-2009.html#reply-31854</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This year will be a big test for Coach U and the Bears. It&#39;s really going to be the first year in which the players expect to win consistantly, whereas the
last several years have had the memory of the 05 season where they went 0-9. If he can keep them concentrated, the Bears might be able to pull of the win, my
personal opinion however says Lakeshore will come out on top though because they have a veteran team returning save for a great running back and great
quaterback. That I think will hinder them come playoff time, but not a moment before. Should be a great year through and through though. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (FBR2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/31854</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:59:33 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who is the favorite in the Southwestern Mich Athletic Conf WEST - 2009  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/31810/t/---favorite---Southwestern-Mich-Athletic-Conf-WEST-2009.html#reply-31810</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Lakeshore is always a safe bet and they did oust St. Joe form the playoffs last season. I am not to sure about Portage Central they have been good the past few
years but have not been able to get over the hump since Coach Knight retired. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (GHSfootball1990)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/31810</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:22:43 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who is the favorite in the Southwestern Mich Athletic Conf WEST - 2009  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/31804/t/---favorite---Southwestern-Mich-Athletic-Conf-WEST-2009.html#reply-31804</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This should be a good race. St. Joe has to replace a ton of really good players, so they might be vulnerable early. Lakeshore is just tough and physical every
year, and Portage Central is very well coached and runs the veer as good as anyone in the state, but they have to replace their excellent QB of last year.
Should be very, very interesting. I&#39;ll give the nod to Lakeshore, but any of the three could pull off the championship. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (TNTDyno)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/31804</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:37:02 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who is the favorite in the Southwestern Mich Athletic Conf WEST - 2009  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/31802/t/---favorite---Southwestern-Mich-Athletic-Conf-WEST-2009.html#reply-31802</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hard to vote against coach U and the Bears. He really has things turned around in Saint Joseph. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (GHSfootball1990)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/31802</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:54:14 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Who is the favorite in the Southwestern Mich Athletic Conf WEST - 2009  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/6816/t/---favorite---Southwestern-Mich-Athletic-Conf-WEST-2009.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ ? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Searn)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/6816</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:14:53 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>