<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Who do you like in D5 going into 2009? </title>
        <link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/6886/t/Who-do-you-like-in-D5-going-into-2009-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[  ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Kickapps</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:12:37 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:08:32 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.kickapps.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://kickapps.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who do you like in D5 going into 2009?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/32289/t/Who-do-you-like-in-D5-going-into-2009-.html#reply-32289</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I also agree that Oakridge and Lumen Christi are the favorites. Fact is you can never count either team out regardless of returning players because they both
seem to reload so well. But, yes with Christi returning most of their team and Oakridge bringing back some key skill guys, Lumen might have a slight edge.
However, I&#39;m going to have to go with my Eagles on this one =) ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (wtmancantjmp)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/32289</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:54:50 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who do you like in D5 going into 2009?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/32263/t/Who-do-you-like-in-D5-going-into-2009-.html#reply-32263</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It will be wide open again this year. There are a number of good teams that have a decent chance, and with the right chemistry, work ethic, and a bit of luck
(this always helps), many have a decent chance.
<br>
<br>
Obviously a returning state championship team with a core of players and a stellar coach give Oakridge a serious chance. What we&#39;ve heard about JLC with
great players and a great coach make them contenders. Menominee was dominant for a few years and is always a possible consideration. Allendale has built a very
strong program and last year gave the amazing MCC team their toughest battle, and with a few plays different could have beaten MCC.
<br>
<br>
It will be fun to watch as the season unfolds to see how our predictions turn out. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (GoalPost)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/32263</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:53:56 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who do you like in D5 going into 2009?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/32231/t/Who-do-you-like-in-D5-going-into-2009-.html#reply-32231</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It is between the two of them.
<br>
<br>
I attended their semi final game last season and both teams were loaded with underclassmen.
<br>
<br>
The score did not indicate how dominate Oakridge was and so I cannot believe Christi has the horses to beat them this season.  <img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/pimp.gif" alt="image"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (MC)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/32231</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:07:41 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who do you like in D5 going into 2009?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/32219/t/Who-do-you-like-in-D5-going-into-2009-.html#reply-32219</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ JLC got my vote. They return just about everyone, and are due. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (trezdustrial)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/32219</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:38:44 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who do you like in D5 going into 2009?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/32211/t/Who-do-you-like-in-D5-going-into-2009-.html#reply-32211</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I know what you have back, and although your two players are good, Lumen returns alot more that you do... and they play a little tougher schedule in my
opinion, Im in no way knocking your schedule, or program, because its great and really fun team to watch, I just believe that this is a good a team as Lumen
has probably had in recent years... They are my pick to win in in Div 5, and Im from Onsted... Im just being realistic, I think your team should do fine as
well as my Wildcats.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (slaphappy)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/32211</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:11:11 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who do you like in D5 going into 2009?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/32207/t/Who-do-you-like-in-D5-going-into-2009-.html#reply-32207</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well you don&#39;t HAVE to have them there. I don&#39;t think Oakridge lost enough to drop them from serious contention. Shoop and Potts being back alone is
enough to get them pretty far. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (eagleCHAMP05)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/32207</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:42:15 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Who do you like in D5 going into 2009?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/32193/t/Who-do-you-like-in-D5-going-into-2009-.html#reply-32193</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Seriously have to have Lumen as the odds on Fav. Although I look forward to watching my Wildcats from Onsted play them in the playoffs again... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (slaphappy)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/32193</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:29:24 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Who do you like in D5 going into 2009?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/6886/t/Who-do-you-like-in-D5-going-into-2009-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Searn)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/6886</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:12:37 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>