http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/7108/t/Searn-Super-32-WEEK-THREE-2009.html en-us Copyright 2006, Kickapps feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster) Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:24:20 GMT Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:09:02 GMT Kickapps Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://kickapps.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://kickapps.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Domain q http://kickapps.com/search/direct/ http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/33557/t/Searn-Super-32-WEEK-THREE-2009.html#reply-33557 feeds@kickapps.com (xman0955) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/33557 Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:08:59 PST http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/33463/t/Searn-Super-32-WEEK-THREE-2009.html#reply-33463 BiasedGuy wrote:

---

So I would venture to guess that Hudsonville will make an HM note for this week, having lost to the #3 team on your list, and putting 29 pts on your number 18 team in a win?


Edit: Save yourself the trouble. They play Rockford this week.

1 of 2 is true about Hudsonville ..

#1. Hudsonville is actually down this year (as most thought) and Lake Orion let them back into that game ... or possibly LO is overrated
or
#2. Hudsonville is as good as beating LO showed ... and CC is just the class of the state by far this season.

Usually even when a game is lopsided between two good teams ... I can usually see something in the loser that tells me they are still a good team, and just having an off night ... . such as when I saw East Grand Rapids get handled by Lowell last season ... I still knew EGR was a very good team.... I didn't see... ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (Searn) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/33463 Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:50:29 PST http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/33435/t/Searn-Super-32-WEEK-THREE-2009.html#reply-33435

Edit: Save yourself the trouble. They play Rockford this week. ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (BiasedGuy) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/33435 Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:41:31 PST http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/33432/t/Searn-Super-32-WEEK-THREE-2009.html#reply-33432 ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (TOMMYZ) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/33432 Mon, 07 Sep 2009 06:44:56 PST http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/33431/t/Searn-Super-32-WEEK-THREE-2009.html#reply-33431
I'll still say Top 8 ... But I'm keeping an eye on #8

There's quite a bit of OK Red, CHSL Central and MAC Red in my Top 10 ... Which stands to reason I have serious doubts that many of my Top 10 outside of possibly EGR will finish 9-0. ... But even then there's Lowell .... Should be fun. ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (Searn) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/33431 Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:31:19 PST http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/33428/t/Searn-Super-32-WEEK-THREE-2009.html#reply-33428 Searn wrote:

---

I have SHS, Rockford and CC really close ... but that's true of my whole Top 10 ... I don't believe much separates any of them (especially the top 8)

I would concur...........except I might stop the SCOOTWAG list at 7. Saw musky play yesterday and they were, um, not the Muskegon we've come to know. Plenty of talent. But, against any good, disciplined team, they'd have come up short yesterday. The OK Red sched will sort this out, or maybe they'll put it together. Either way, good job so far this year. ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (EastGuRu) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/33428 Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:49:19 PST http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/33415/t/Searn-Super-32-WEEK-THREE-2009.html#reply-33415
I have SHS, Rockford and CC really close ... but that's true of my whole Top 10 ... I don't believe much separates any of them (especially the top 8) ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (Searn) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/33415 Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:26:41 PST http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/33412/t/Searn-Super-32-WEEK-THREE-2009.html#reply-33412
When I went to prepseer's blog earlier in the day I could have sworn that he listed Canton at 1 - 1. So one of you is wrong. ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/33412 Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:10:58 PST http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/33411/t/Searn-Super-32-WEEK-THREE-2009.html#reply-33411
Could be right in the end on EK... and I may have jumped the gun ... .... but I'd put their two early wins up there with any (2-0) team right now ... so I think it's deserving based on what's actually happened this season.

It's still early and we don't have much to go on ... but EK is off to a nice start.






]]> feeds@kickapps.com (Searn) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/33411 Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:08:07 PST http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/33410/t/Searn-Super-32-WEEK-THREE-2009.html#reply-33410 feeds@kickapps.com (redmetro) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/33410 Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:01:52 PST http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/33408/t/Searn-Super-32-WEEK-THREE-2009.html#reply-33408 feeds@kickapps.com (youthsports) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/33408 Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:29:51 PST http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/7108/t/Searn-Super-32-WEEK-THREE-2009.html HERE
]]> feeds@kickapps.com (Searn) http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/7108 Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:24:20 PST