Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA) — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:17:27 PST

Ratings are always interesting. If Manchester is second in D6, then Clinton should be 2B since they took The Flying Dutchmen into a very controversial week 1 overtime game. Hopefully there can be a rematch.

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (MrObvious2) — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:09:12 PST

I had posted last week that I felt the top 3 teams in D1 were pretty interchangeable and even, and questioned why SHS seemed to be the consensus #1.

Well, the new AP polls are out, and looky-looky - it's a 3 way tie at the top. I somehow doubt that's ever happened before in any of the classes at the top. Thank God we have playoffs and not some BCS formula to try to determine which of those should play for the mythical title.

http://studentandathlete....009_Footballrankings.htm

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (DHooligan3485) — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:16:04 PST

He's obviously a SHS fan, and he's entitled to his opinion. I wonder which CC game you've seen considering they haven't really been challenged by anybody except for Brother Rice (24-7 score, but 10-7 early in 4th quarter). And I would also like to take CC +14 against anybody in Michigan, including SHS.

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (EastGuRu) — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:09:42 PST

heh heh...he said "elite"....

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (Searn) — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:36:48 PST

fuzzduzz wrote:
I was at that game.... two great football teams..... CC's best that I can remember...... unfortionately won't be the same result this time..... CC is not even comparable to that team....SHS instead of two great running backs they have one great qb....... my money's on SHS by 14....

For what it's worth ...

Looking at this going into the playoffs .... I would say CC beating SHS in 1997 would be a much bigger upset at the time than if CC beats SHS in 2009.

Back in 1997 people thought it was Rockford, SHS, Troy and then everyone else. .... this year CC is at least part of what is considered the elite D1 group (SHS, CC and Rockford this year)

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (diesel) — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:44:06 PST

CC's first team D has given up a total of 17 points all season. Good luck scoring 40+! Plus, if CC moves the ball on the ground it speeds the game up a lot. If SHS were to beat CC, I would guess the score would be something like 14-10.

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (ftballer67) — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:16:19 PST

BTW I'll take CC +14 vs anyone in the state. Name your price. That is an absurd bet.

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (ftballer67) — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:13:40 PST

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Multiple replays in the press box proved he was in.

For the record, at the 2:00:57 mark of the video, is the 4th qtr, 4th and 12 TD play that was taken away from Dakota. That was a great TD catch that Deandre earned, and some poor officiating. You can clearly see Deandre Smith scored a TD, no doubt about it. Herman Moore doesn't have any doubt either.

I think the playoff rematch would be another classic game.

http://mhsaa.tv/events/7075

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (fuzzduzz) — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:05:37 PST

SHS 21-7 at the half....Dakota looked terrible..... Cougars ran opening 2nd half kickoff back 98 yrs. to change momentum..... A few SHS turn overs... drop passes.... and you have a close game..... I was sitting on SHS side about the 35 yrd line....looked like the receiver was in bounds to me in the end zone..... but multiple reviews in the press box confirmed he ws out..... When they meet again in the playoffs I doubt it will be very close.... In my humble opinion...

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (fuzzduzz) — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:39:37 PST

I was at that game.... two great football teams..... CC's best that I can remember...... unfortionately won't be the same result this time..... CC is not even comparable to that team....SHS instead of two great running backs they have one great qb....... my money's on SHS by 14....

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (fuzzduzz) — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:35:52 PST

Madison should be in your top 10... I kid you not.... They could be called "The Detroit Allstars"... I'm sure the coach at Madison ( Head coach in Detroit for 19 yrs.) has the better players comming out to play for him..... hard to believe...Not after you see them play....

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA) — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:11:25 PST

I don't recall the Titans putting up 40 against the Cougars. The Cougars probably should have won that game but was robbed by the refs.

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (Blue) — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:20:54 PST

fuzzduzz wrote:

fuzzduzz

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (Blotto98) — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:11:33 PST
Well we all know the ladies love a big post count

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (MrObvious2) — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:57:31 PST
That's exactly the insight I was looking for. Like I said, I've not seen CC or SHS play, and judging by results and schedule alone, they looked fairly evenly matched.

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (Searn) — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:01:03 PST

Mr NCAA wrote:

So, am I the only one who thinks mipreps rankings are ridiculous?
They are alway way different. That's why I don't really pay that much attention to them.

Searn likes to build his post count by doing posts within posts. It would be greatly appreciated if you would just post your ratings and combine polls on here instead of posting a thread to a link so it is actually one hit instead of two. Where is the combine poll originating from since I can't find it in the poll area?

Combined Ranking Area ...

To me it's better to keep them all in the same area as it's much easier to look back by going to a single page instead of searching up and down this forum with 50 or so pages of topics.

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (fuzzduzz) — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:38:37 PST

fuzzduzz

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (SnoozeToMe) — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:49:06 PST

Mr NCAA wrote:
Searn likes to build his post count...

Just gotta smile and move on.

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA) — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:15:51 PST

So, am I the only one who thinks mipreps rankings are ridiculous?
They are alway way different. That's why I don't really pay that much attention to them.

Searn likes to build his post count by doing posts within posts. It would be greatly appreciated if you would just post your ratings and combine polls on here instead of posting a thread to a link so it is actually one hit instead of two. Where is the combine poll originating from since I can't find it in the poll area?

Re: Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (MrObvious2) — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:56:17 PST
What would yours be, Tommy? I looked at their rankings, and they're are some things I don't agree with - specifically CC being #5. I did my own, trying to factor in actual performance with where I actually think they should rank. I wanted to put East Kentwood at 10, but between causing calls of "West side bias", they have 2 losses.

1) Catholic Central
2) Rockford
3) Stevenson
(To me, these are the obvious top 3 teams at this point. You could easily switch the order around. Is there something about Stevenson that makes them the consensus #1 to everyone in these rankings?)
4) East Grand Rapids
5) Canton
6) Grand Haven (close games, yes, but a tough schedule and only 1 loss)
7) Dakota
8) Lowell
9) Southeastern
10) Mount Pleasant or Dewitt (tie)

Once I did my top 10, I think MiPreps has Lowell too high, and CC too low, and obviously don't agree with his exclusion of Dakota. Their rankings seem...

Michigan Combined Rankings - WEEK EIGHT - 2009

feeds@kickapps.com (Searn) — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:28:44 PST
Link