Playoff divisions with Calpreps results

Playoff divisions with Calpreps results http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/7361/t/Playoff-divisions-with-Calpreps-results.html en-us Copyright 2006, Kickapps feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster) Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:36:48 GMT Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:31:39 GMT Kickapps Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://kickapps.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://kickapps.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://kickapps.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: Playoff divisions with Calpreps results ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35233/t/Playoff-divisions-with-Calpreps-results.html#reply-35233
I did do the rough calcs but they did not have the Saginaw forfeits, nor do they take in the bonus points for the opponents wins in the last week. These generally wash out, as most teams get 3 or 4 wins from their opponents. So those are the numbers I publish. They will all be low.

When I am interested - as this year for class B - what I do is take the generated list and place their season on a spreadsheet with about 10 of the 5-4 closest competitors.
]]> feeds@kickapps.com (AuldSchool) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35233 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:31:39 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Playoff divisions with Calpreps results ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35228/t/Playoff-divisions-with-Calpreps-results.html#reply-35228 SnoozeToMe wrote:

Thanks Hiesman,

That's the answer I was hoping for.

I'm a little confused about the Gross Ile comment (looking at the chart, Standish-Sterling is your last Class B at-large), but it doesn't impact anything anyway.
Oh you're right. It WAS Gross Ile before the forfiet stuff started changing things - B had 7 at-larges and GI had the 7th...so those other schools would have to leap them if they wanted to grab a potential 7th B at-large.
]]> feeds@kickapps.com (Hiesman84) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35228 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:00:58 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Playoff divisions with Calpreps results ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35227/t/Playoff-divisions-with-Calpreps-results.html#reply-35227
That's the answer I was hoping for.

I'm a little confused about the Gross Ile comment (looking at the chart, Standish-Sterling is your last Class B at-large), but it doesn't impact anything anyway. ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (SnoozeToMe) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35227 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:52:32 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Playoff divisions with Calpreps results ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35223/t/Playoff-divisions-with-Calpreps-results.html#reply-35223
#1, Auldschool ran those class-B at larges for me (actually I think someone did it for him) and both Richmond and MLN are SO CLOSE as 5-4 that it would not be a surprise if they did pick up a bonus point somewhere and pass Gross Ile, the final of the class B at larges.

#2, I am just guessing here, but at 5-4 they might be the first 2 schools in line for an extra class-B at large, if the weekend results played out in such a way as to add another one.

So all is not lost for those fans. ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (Hiesman84) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35223 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:46:01 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Playoff divisions with Calpreps results ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35201/t/Playoff-divisions-with-Calpreps-results.html#reply-35201
Somebody on MLive mentioned that Richmond (5-3) is not on the list. They play Macomb Lutheran North (4-4). I don't see either team on your list.

EDIT: If I understand your chart, a win by Richmond would take away the last at-large team, which would be Dearborn... and EVERYBODY from Temperence-Bedford down to Richmond would move one spot up in the list. Hopefully, Calpreps just picks MLN to win. ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (SnoozeToMe) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35201 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:08:55 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Playoff divisions with Calpreps results ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35195/t/Playoff-divisions-with-Calpreps-results.html#reply-35195
either direction, we are going to have to face a powerhouse "full-house-T" team in the 2nd round, eithre SMCC who we are 1-3 against, or Hudson who beat us in a week 4 game in which we never once punted. So either way it will be a challenge (though playing on the road may be just the chip on the shoulder this year's team needs...

But where it really matters is this - we want to GET TO WORK asap - it really stinks for us coaches that we have to wait (like everyone else) until a TV show at 7PM on a SUNDAY night!. By the time we learn our opponent (7:15pm), make contact with them, arrange a meeting, meet & trade film, get home, and make copies for the staff members, it's 10 or 11PM before we even get started with film breakdown. So if we can get it narrowed down to the 3-or so most likely opponents today, then we can spend tomorrow contacting those possible opponent schools & coaches and try to make arrangements ahead of time.... ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (Hiesman84) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35195 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:27 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Playoff divisions with Calpreps results ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35183/t/Playoff-divisions-with-Calpreps-results.html#reply-35183 Hiesman84 wrote:

SnoozeToMe wrote:

Heisman,

I'm going to make maps for these projections. Stay tuned...

Snooze - I was just about to email you!!!...#1, thank you for doing that...as you would expect, I already have the D-6 map done, and I have a question for you...

Under this scenario, who goes east with Harper woods, Ecorse, and SMCC....will it be Blissfield or Clinton?

Anyone else who has knowledge of how the state views "driving distance" when putting maps together, feel free to chime in once snooze puts the maps up.

D6 was interesting... If only we could move Ithaca! To answer your question, I move Blissfield east.

The maps are done, so see for yourself.

EDIT -... ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (SnoozeToMe) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35183 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:52:07 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Playoff divisions with Calpreps results ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35182/t/Playoff-divisions-with-Calpreps-results.html#reply-35182 SnoozeToMe wrote:

Heisman,

I'm going to make maps for these projections. Stay tuned...

Snooze - I was just about to email you!!!...#1, thank you for doing that...as you would expect, I already have the D-6 map done, and I have a question for you...

Under this scenario, who goes east with Harper woods, Ecorse, and SMCC....will it be Blissfield or Clinton?

Anyone else who has knowledge of how the state views "driving distance" when putting maps together, feel free to chime in once snooze puts the maps up.
]]> feeds@kickapps.com (Hiesman84) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35182 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:10:28 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Playoff divisions with Calpreps results ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35181/t/Playoff-divisions-with-Calpreps-results.html#reply-35181 I'm going to make maps for these projections. Stay tuned...

Gotta love this guys dedication!

A local station over here interviewd a guy from MHSAA yesterday. The MHSAA guy talked about the "maps with pins and everything" that are out there. He said he thinks you "have too much time on your hands"

But then he said something along the lines of he didnt want to be to hard on the people doing it because they are having fun with it. ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (trezdustrial) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35181 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:52:17 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Playoff divisions with Calpreps results ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35180/t/Playoff-divisions-with-Calpreps-results.html#reply-35180
I'm going to make maps for these projections. Stay tuned... ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (SnoozeToMe) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35180 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:10:53 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Playoff divisions with Calpreps results ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35179/t/Playoff-divisions-with-Calpreps-results.html#reply-35179
It's bound to move a little... one way or the other, but nice work! ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (trezdustrial) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35179 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:06:02 PST <![CDATA[ Playoff divisions with Calpreps results ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/7361/t/Playoff-divisions-with-Calpreps-results.html
Using the calpreps projections we have 25 at-large teams, a little higher than some of the other projections. I reviewed any calpreps prediction that was 3-points or less, and I believe there were 2-games where I disagreed with the calpreps result and went with my own conclusion (Capac, and Adrian Madison via first-hand knowledge). IF there were others, they will be noted in one of the columns.

http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/7361Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:36:48 PST