Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9

Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/7379/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html en-us Copyright 2006, Kickapps feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster) Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:06:44 GMT Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:39:57 GMT Kickapps Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://kickapps.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://kickapps.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://kickapps.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35415/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35415 feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35415 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:39:24 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35381/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35381 feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35381 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:10:23 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35379/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35379 ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (prepseer) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35379 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:58:43 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35369/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35369 Mr NCAA wrote:

Please leave your maps in place for the first week after the official pairings are announced. I want to take a look at how the MHSAA did it vs. the way that you have your maps.
No problem! ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (SnoozeToMe) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35369 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:01:18 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35368/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35368 LindenGuy wrote:

EastGuRu wrote:

Snooze,

I have a sneaking suspicion that the MHSAA will send Linden and North Branch "north" to join Mt. Pleasant and BJG. First, They are likely to keep Fowlerville with Dewitt, since they play in the same league and also I think they will try to avoid an early Mt Pleasant v Dewitt matchup (when they can).

So....Dewitt, Sexton, mason and Fowlerville to complement the above suspicion. Great Job BTW

If they do that it wouldn't make much sense travel wise b/c North Branch would be traveling all the way to Mt. Pleasant for the first game which is over 100 miles away and Glenn would be traveling over 60 miles to Linden. Then if the favorites won, it would be another hundred miles for mt. p to Linden.

Where as the... ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (SnoozeToMe) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35368 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:59:58 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35367/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35367 TNTDyno wrote:

For D5, I would not be surprised to see JLC and Hillsdale flopped. The MHSAA has used the logic that JLC is easier to reach for the far west teams based on their location near I-94, so they've sent them west in the past for this reason.
That makes sense if it's easier. I thought travel time (from the west) would be about the same, since Hillsdale is slightly more west (but farther off the highway). JLC is slightly closer to the other "green" teams as well. ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (SnoozeToMe) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35367 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:58:11 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35366/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35366 lowmanwins wrote:

Is there any chance that Ish. Westwood goes into d6?
No, they will be D7... unless there is some unforeseen problem (forfeit or something). The districts may be wrong, but the teams in each division are correct. ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (SnoozeToMe) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35366 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:52:45 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35365/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35365 EastGuRu wrote:

Snooze,

I have a sneaking suspicion that the MHSAA will send Linden and North Branch "north" to join Mt. Pleasant and BJG. First, They are likely to keep Fowlerville with Dewitt, since they play in the same league and also I think they will try to avoid an early Mt Pleasant v Dewitt matchup (when they can).

So....Dewitt, Sexton, mason and Fowlerville to complement the above suspicion. Great Job BTW If they do that it wouldn't make much sense travel wise b/c North Branch would be traveling all the way to Mt. Pleasant for the first game which is over 100 miles away and Glenn would be traveling over 60 miles to Linden. Then if the favorites won, it would be another hundred miles for mt. p to Linden.

Where as the way Snooze has it now, its 50 miles to Linden from NB, 27 from Fowlerville to Mason & 46 Mt p to Bay city and 14 from Dewitt... ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (LindenGuy) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35365 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:34:10 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35364/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35364 feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35364 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:07:49 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35363/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35363
I have a sneaking suspicion that the MHSAA will send Linden and North Branch "north" to join Mt. Pleasant and BJG. First, They are likely to keep Fowlerville with Dewitt, since they play in the same league and also I think they will try to avoid an early Mt Pleasant v Dewitt matchup (when they can).

So....Dewitt, Sexton, mason and Fowlerville to complement the above suspicion. Great Job BTW ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (EastGuRu) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35363 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:50:55 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35361/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35361 Hiesman84 wrote:

Hey Snooze...

You know....if you make Grass Lake purple, Blissfield & Addison aqua, and Clinton brown, it would shorten up the round-1 driving distances in ALL THREE of those districts...

: ) : ) : ) Tell me I'm right, and tell me the MHSAA will see that...TELL ME IT"S SO!!! : )
Ok Hiesman,

I looked at D6 again, and kept half of your idea, but not the half you wanted. I swapped Addison and Grass Lake, but couldn't move Blissfield out of the "Brown" district. It just didn't look right to me.

The MHSAA doesn't (or shouldn't) take my maps seriously. They know what they're doing, and will do the right thing. If the smart thing is to send Clinton east, I'm sure they will do so. For your sake, I hope they do it your way.

Who knows, maybe they'll come up with something... ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (SnoozeToMe) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35361 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:10:03 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35360/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35360 AuldSchool wrote:

If I might suggest for Div 4 in case you are busy. (And not that we all wouldn't appreciate even the thought of another trip to the Superior Dome,) I think this follows from your last map.

CC in place of Dowagiac in 2-1

Dowagiac in place of LCC in 2-2

LCC for Flint Powers in 3-1

Flint Powers for Marysville in 3-2

Marysville for MH Lamphere in 4-1

MH Lamphere for Det Old Redford in 4-2

I didn't see this until I had already changed D4, but I think I took all your suggestions, right? ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (SnoozeToMe) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35360 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:51:05 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35358/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35358 feeds@kickapps.com (TNTDyno) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35358 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:50:29 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35357/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35357 feeds@kickapps.com (lowmanwins) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35357 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:49:27 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35356/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35356 prepseer wrote:

Thanks for your work on the maps. Great job. I do have a question on Division 2. I think your pairings make the most sense, but they do not follow the announced formula that the MHSAA supposedly uses. That is, they start North and work their way west, then head to Metro Detoit. Under that scenario, you would have to pair Midland and Bay City Western with the Western teams--probably St. John's and Lowell. That's what I did, not because I think it works best, but because I was trying to predict the MHSAA pairings. It caused some problems trying to find two teams to go west to play the Portage teams. Your solution works, but I wonder if that's the way the MHSAA will go. Can you comment. Thanks.

Thanks prep.

I have several thoughts, and don't want to take time to organize them as I'd like... forgive me if I bop around with my response.... ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (SnoozeToMe) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35356 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:35:09 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35354/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35354
If I might suggest for Div 4 in case you are busy. (And not that we all wouldn't appreciate even the thought of another trip to the Superior Dome,) I think this follows from your last map.

CC in place of Dowagiac in 2-1
Dowagiac in place of LCC in 2-2
LCC for Flint Powers in 3-1
Flint Powers for Marysville in 3-2
Marysville for MH Lamphere in 4-1
MH Lamphere for Det Old Redford in 4-2
]]> feeds@kickapps.com (AuldSchool) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35354 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:26:20 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35353/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35353 ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (prepseer) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35353 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:37:41 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35352/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35352 feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35352 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:35:49 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35351/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35351
Just posted all the updated (hopefully final) numbers.

Only did 23 different versions today.
]]> feeds@kickapps.com (AuldSchool) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35351 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:23:57 PST <![CDATA[ Re: Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35350/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html#reply-35350 feeds@kickapps.com (Hiesman84) http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35350 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:12:20 PST <![CDATA[ Projected Playoff Maps Wk 9 ]]> http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/7379/t/Projected-Playoff-Maps-Wk-9.html Week 9 Maps have been posted.

These will very likely change throughout the night, as game results come in. ]]> feeds@kickapps.com (SnoozeToMe) http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/7379 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:06:44 PST