<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Some 2009 playoff statistics </title>
        <link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/7449/t/Some-2009-playoff-statistics.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Here is the chart:




  
    
      
        FIRST ROUND
      

      

      

      
    

    
      
        HIGHER SEEDED TEAM WINNING
      

      
        W
      

      
        L
      

      
        PCT.
      
    

    
      
        Division 1
      

      
        13
      

      
        3
      

      
        0.813
      
    

    
      
        Division 2
      

      
        9
      

      
        7
      

      
        0.563... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Kickapps</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:57:56 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:03:16 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.kickapps.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://kickapps.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Some 2009 playoff statistics  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/36345/t/Some-2009-playoff-statistics.html#reply-36345</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">AuldSchool wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  <strong><br>
  Expresses the standard deviation as a % of the play-off point average. In the previous post it looked like Div VIII had the tightest grouping, but really it
  looks like Div II wins the &#39;most competitive&#39; and &#39; Div VII the least.
  <br>
  <br></strong>

  <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="260">
    <colgroup>
      <col width="65">
      <col span="2" width="65">
      <col width="65">
    </col></col></col></colgroup>

    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td class="xl24">Divison</td>

        <td class="xl25">POP Ave</td>

        <td class="xl25">StDev</td>

        <td class="xl28"></td>
      </tr>

      <tr>
        <td class="xl24">Div I</td>

        <td class="xl27" align="right">87.816</td>

        <td class="xl27" align="right">18.016</td>

        <td class="xl28">20.5%</td>
      </tr>

      <tr>
        <td class="xl24">Div II</td>

        <td... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (EastGuRu)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/36345</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:03:15 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Some 2009 playoff statistics  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/36299/t/Some-2009-playoff-statistics.html#reply-36299</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <strong><br>
Expresses the standard deviation as a % of the play-off point average. In the previous post it looked like Div VIII had the tightest grouping, but really it
looks like Div II wins the &#39;most competitive&#39; and &#39; Div VII the least.
<br>
<br></strong>

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="260">
  <col width="65">
  <col span="2" width="65">
  <col width="65">

  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td class="xl24">Divison</td>

      <td class="xl25">POP Ave</td>

      <td class="xl25">StDev</td>

      <td class="xl28"> </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <td class="xl24">Div I</td>

      <td class="xl27" align="right">87.816</td>

      <td class="xl27" align="right">18.016</td>

      <td class="xl28">20.5%</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <td class="xl24">Div II</td>

      <td class="xl27" align="right">77.687</td>

      <td class="xl27" align="right">10.647</td>

      <td class="xl28">13.7%</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <td class="xl24">Div III</td>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (AuldSchool)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/36299</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:12:40 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Some 2009 playoff statistics  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/36298/t/Some-2009-playoff-statistics.html#reply-36298</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <span style="color:#000060"><span style="font-size:14px"><strong><br>
Have been meaning to post this since selection Sunday.
<br>
<br>
<br>
The standard deviation should be some indicator of how competitive the division should be, but now that I think about it, the sd should be a % of the play-off
point average. I&#39;ll post those in a bit.
<br>
<br>
 </strong></span></span>

<table style="border-collapse: collapse;" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="390">
  <col width="65">
  <col span="5" width="65">

  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td class="xl24" height="13" width="65">Divison</td>

      <td class="xl25" width="65">Win%</td>

      <td class="xl25" width="65">Wins</td>

      <td class="xl25" width="65">Losses</td>

      <td class="xl25" width="65">POP Ave</td>

      <td class="xl25" width="65">StDev</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <td class="xl24" height="12">Div I</td>

      <td class="xl26">78.4%</td>

      <td class="xl25">225</td>

      <td... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (AuldSchool)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/36298</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:03:53 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Some 2009 playoff statistics  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/36039/t/Some-2009-playoff-statistics.html#reply-36039</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 3 out of my 4 Friday undefeated teams hit the dusty trail.  Not too bad after that 90% stat for week 1.  2 more games today though. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/36039</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:27:58 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Some 2009 playoff statistics  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35773/t/Some-2009-playoff-statistics.html#reply-35773</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Here is another playoff stat for week 1:
<br>

<table dir="ltr" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="367" border="0">
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td width="67%" height="20">
        <p align="left"><font face="Calibri">#1 Seeds that weren&#39;t undefeated</font></p>
      </td>

      <td width="8%" height="20">
        <p align="center"><font face="Calibri">26</font></p>
      </td>

      <td width="8%" height="20">
        <p align="center"><font face="Calibri">8</font></p>
      </td>

      <td width="18%" height="20">
        <p align="center"><font face="Calibri">0.765</font></p>
      </td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>
<br>
So #1 seeds were just above the average pct. if they weren&#39;t undefeated. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35773</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:43:13 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Some 2009 playoff statistics  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35767/t/Some-2009-playoff-statistics.html#reply-35767</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 3 of the undefeated teams play on the road this week.  If the 90% figure holds up, then 2 or 3 of the undefeated teams should lose in round two at home.
<br>
<br>
27 - 3 = 24
<br>
24 * .1 = 2.4 teams losing at home
<br>
<br>
<strong>ON MY OFFICIAL LIST</strong>
<br>
Orchard Lake St. Mary over Melvindale
<br>
Ravenna beats Potterville
<br>
<br>
<strong>SOME OTHER POSSIBLE = 1 of these should hit most likely</strong>
<br>
Mt. Pleasant over Linden
<br>
Hamilton over Three Rivers
<br>
Berrien Springs over Wyoming Kelloggsville
<br>
Muskegon Catholic Central over Climax Scotts
<br>
<br>
If you want to put Romeo over Clarkston on your list, that&#39;s fine with me.  I just think that the others on my list are more probable. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35767</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:00:52 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Some 2009 playoff statistics  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/reply/35747/t/Some-2009-playoff-statistics.html#reply-35747</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>I should add it to my score spreadsheet but that made the #2 seeds 44 - 20 = .688.  So it pays to be a #1 seed as well by a ton.</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/35747</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:36:38 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Some 2009 playoff statistics  ]]></title>
			<link>http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/7449/t/Some-2009-playoff-statistics.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Here is the chart:
<br>
<br>

<table dir="ltr" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="367" border="0">
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td width="67%" height="20">
        <p align="left"><strong><font face="Calibri">FIRST ROUND</font></strong></p>
      </td>

      <td width="8%" height="20"></td>

      <td width="8%" height="20"></td>

      <td width="18%" height="20"></td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <td width="67%" height="20">
        <p align="left"><strong><font face="Calibri">HIGHER SEEDED TEAM WINNING</font></strong></p>
      </td>

      <td width="8%" height="20">
        <p align="center"><strong><font face="Calibri">W</font></strong></p>
      </td>

      <td width="8%" height="20">
        <p align="center"><strong><font face="Calibri">L</font></strong></p>
      </td>

      <td width="18%" height="20">
        <p align="center"><strong><font face="Calibri">PCT.</font></strong></p>
      </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <td width="67%" height="20">
        <p... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Mr NCAA)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://michiganhsfootball.com/topic/7449</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:57:56 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>