With his team scoring a TD to go ahead by the score of 6 - 5 in the late 3rd quarter, Teddy Ginn Sr. decided to go for 1 for Cleveland Glenville. The team
made the PAT despite the fact that the team had problems punting all game long. According to my go for 2 chart, Glenville should have went for 2 especially
since it was a low scoring game and teams need to use the chart ASAP in those type of situations since there won't be very many more chances of scoring.
Cleveland St. Ignatius went on to kick a FG to win the playoff game 8 - 7. SI had scored previously on a block punt safety in the endzone plus another FG. So
how many of you agree with me that Glenville should have went for 2 and how many of you agree with Teddy Sr. to go for 1? I ask this since on mdead we keep on
hearing how much better Ohio is than Michigan is, but if they can't even use that go for 2 chart properly in a low scoring game, I'm not seeing how
coaching plays that imporant of an aspect in Ohio high school football.






